Medical treatment should only be proposed for a child of any age (ie a person under the age of 18) if the treatment is considered to be in the child's best interests. Case law has established that the patient's best interests are not limited to best medical interests (Re: MB (Medical Treatmenht)[1997] 2 FLR 426) but also encompass "medical, emotional and all other welfare issues" (Butler-Sloss in Re A (Male Sterilisation)[2000] 1 FLR 549.
However in Re: S (A Minor) Medical Treatment) [1983] 1 FLR 376 the judge held that "the court, exercising its prerogative of protection should be very slow to allow an infant to martyr himself".
In Re: L (Medical Treatment: Gillick Competency) [1998] 2 FLR 811 a 14 year old child had not been given information about the distressing nature of her inevitable deaht if she did not have a blood transfusion. The judge found at 813 that the failure to provide the information was material to his finding gthat she was not Gillick competrent because "it is quite clear that she has not been able to be given all the details which it would be right and appropriate to have in mind when making such a decision".
Equally pertinent is the case of Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) [1992] 4 All ER 649 where Lord Donaldson said "The real question in each case is, Does the patient really mean that he says or is he merely saying it for a quiet life, to satisfy someone else or because the advice and persuasion to which he has been subjected is such that he can no longer think and decide for himself? In other words, Is it a decision in form only, not in reality?". He went on to say that when considering the effect of outside influences, two aspects can be of crucial importance. They are the strength of will of the patient and the relationship of the "persuader" to the patient. With regard to the latter, his Lorship said that the "influence of parents on their children...can be, but is by no means necessarilyi, much stronger than would be the case in other relationships".
If the doctor proposing treatment considers the child has been subject to undue pressure by another person (be it friends, family, elders, Hospital Liaison Committee etc), then the decision of the child is not valid. Emergency treatment to prevent death or a serious deterioration can be given if the care team consider it in the best interests of the child, however if there is sufficient time a court order should be sought before treatment commences.
For further detailed information I would strongly recommend that the reader refers to "The Mental Health Act Manual" by Richard Jones, 9th edition, published by Sweet and Maxwell. There is a whole section in the back of the book relating to the common law and the law relating to medical treatment of children.
It is time that children are protected from the dangerous decisions made by their parents who are under the influence of a life destroying cult that cares nothing for human kindness and wellbeing.
Enjoying freedom